[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-29?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Anoop Sam John updated PHOENIX-29:
----------------------------------
Attachment: PHOENIX-29_v4.patch
The empty column generation in Filter happens only in case of mapped tables now
and there the empty CF name will come as
QueryConstants.DEFAULT_COLUMN_FAMILY_BYTES I guess.. Any way it will be good
to do as per ur suggestion. Patch V4 having this change.
Also avoided kv.getRow() call in filterRow(List<KeyValue> kvs) This involves
a byte[] creation and bytes copying and was always happening.!
If +1, I can commit to Master right?
> Add custom filter to more efficiently navigate KeyValues in row
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: PHOENIX-29
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-29
> Project: Phoenix
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: James Taylor
> Attachments: PHOENIX-29.patch, PHOENIX-29_V2.patch,
> PHOENIX-29_v3.patch, PHOENIX-29_v4.patch
>
>
> Currently HBase is 50% faster at selecting the first KV in a row than in
> selecting any other column. The reason is that when you project a column into
> a Scan, HBase uses its ExplicitColumTracker which does a reseek to the
> column. The only case where this is not necessary is when the column is the
> first one.
> In most cases (unless you have thousands of versions), it'd be more efficient
> to just do a NEXT instead of a reseek (especially if your KV is the next
> one). We can provide our own custom filter through which we pass two lists:
> 1) all KVs referenced in the select expressions. These are the only ones that
> need to be returned back to the client which is another advantage we'd get
> writing this custom filter.
> 2) all KVs referenced in the WHERE clause.
> The filter could sort the KVs using the standard KeyValue.COMPARATOR and
> merge between them and the incoming KVs, using NEXT instead of a reseek. We
> could potentially use a reseek if the number of columns in the table is
> beyond a certain threshold.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)