I'll spin this up today. Two questions:
- Should the binary "convenience artifact" tar *not* contain source or
contain source?
- Do we need to vote on the next RC, as I've included a new bug fix in
there? I propose we just start a new vote on the general list, but I'm fine
either way.

Thanks,
James


On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 10:36 AM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]>wrote:

> There was more on general@ about this today.
>
> Current consensus seems to be that a source tarball which does not contain
> binaries is required, this becomes the release. Additional pre-built
> binaries are optional "convenience artifacts"
>
>
>
> On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 2:51 AM, Steven Noels <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Guys,
> >
> > the way I read the comment from Sebb on general@inc it's probably
> > easiest if there's a separate src tarball available as a release
> > artefact.
> >
> > Steven.
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
>    - Andy
>
> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> (via Tom White)
>

Reply via email to