+1 on dropping -----Original Message----- From: Anoop John [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, February 28, 2014 9:08 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Proposal: Should we remove hadoop 1.0 build support in future major release
> It doesn't directly use hadoop. The places it depends on hadoop one or two is in test code like using HBaseMiniCluster. +1 on dropping. -Anoop- On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 8:11 AM, Enis Söztutar <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 on dropping support for hadoop1 in Phoenix. > > I think HBase might still have some support for Hadoop 1 for legacy > reasons, Phoenix is not burdened by that. > > Enis > > > On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 6:40 PM, Jeffrey Zhong <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > Hey, > > > > Phoenix is an application built on top of hbase. It doesn't directly > > use hadoop. The places it depends on hadoop one or two is in test > > code like using HBaseMiniCluster. While during run time, Phoenix > > built with hadoop1 should work with a live hbase cluster running on hadoop2 > > and vice verse. > > In addition, latest Hbase is now built on hadoop2 by default. > > > > Just a thought when I was looking at pom today. If we can remove the > > hadoop1.0 from build, we can clean our code structure and pom quite > > a > bit. > > > > Thanks, > > -Jeffrey > > > > > > > > -- > > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE > > NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or > > entity > to > > which it is addressed and may contain information that is > > confidential, privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable > > law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, > > you are hereby notified > that > > any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or > > forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have > > received this communication in error, please contact the sender > immediately > > and delete it from your system. Thank You. > > >
