[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-21?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

James Taylor updated PHOENIX-21:
--------------------------------

    Issue Type: New Feature  (was: Bug)

> Support indexes on views including tenant-specific views
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: PHOENIX-21
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-21
>             Project: Phoenix
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>    Affects Versions: 3.0.0, 4.0.0, 5.0.0
>            Reporter: James Taylor
>            Assignee: James Taylor
>             Fix For: 3.0.0, 4.0.0, 5.0.0
>
>         Attachments: tenant-specific-index-2.patch, 
> tenant-specific-indexes.patch
>
>
> Current plan is to create a sibling index table based on the base 
> multi-tenant table, suffixed with _INDEX when the base table is created. If 
> your interested in this feature, best to review the following documents first:
> http://phoenix.incubator.apache.org/views.html
> http://phoenix.incubator.apache.org/multi-tenancy.html
> In addition, we need a multi-tenant sequence, again based on the multi-tenant 
> table name suffixed with _SEQ. The base columns in this table would be: the 
> first column from the base table (i.e. the tenant ID column) followed by 
> index id SMALLINT. This index ID is required to ensure that data from 
> different indexes on the same multi-tenant table don't intermix with each 
> other (as the rest of the PK is specific to the index being added). The index 
> ID would be based on the next value in the _SEQ (a multi-tenant sequence). 
> For simplicity, make it two bytes, starting with Short.MIN_VALUE. We'll never 
> reuse an ID, so this gives us 64K create/drop indexes per multi-tenant base 
> table. The rest of the PK columns would depend on the index being created, 
> and would include in this order:
> <any constant columns (think key-prefix here) from your updatable view> 
> <the indexed columns from the create index statement>
> <the rest of the PK columns from the data table - standard logic here>
> The changes necessary to support this include:
> 1. Tracking the constant value referenced on a column for an updatable view 
> in PColumn. Might as well track if a column is referenced by a view as well. 
> Two new columns: IS_REFERENCED_BY_VIEW, CONSTANT_VALUE_IN_VIEW. For the IS 
> NULL case, we can use an empty byte array to differentiate from a null. These 
> values would be passed through the CreateTableCompiler and upserted with the 
> rest of the data.
> 2. Disallow the removal of any column in a view that is referenced in the 
> view statement. An alternative would be to invalidate the view.
> 3. Add a new INDEX_ID column to PTable specifically for an INDEX on a VIEW. 
> This will get populated based on the next value in the sequence.
> 4. Push the CONSTANT_VALUE_IN_VIEW into the IndexMaintainer along with the 
> tenantId and the index ID. These values will be used to form the Put(s) and 
> Delete(s) that get formed when an index is maintained.
> 5. Modify the code that automatically prepends tenant_id to also prepend the 
> index ID in the case. This will be in WhereOptimizer, UpsertCompiler, and 
> DeleteCompiler.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Reply via email to