Found an issue that sunk this RC: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-901. Fix plus new RC coming tomorrow.
Thanks, James On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 5:05 PM, James Taylor <jamestay...@apache.org>wrote: > Hi everyone, > This is a call for a vote on Apache Phoenix 4.0.0 incubating RC2. This is > the next major release of Phoenix compatible with the 0.98 branch of Apache > HBase (0.98.1+) and will be our third release in the incubator. The > previous RC was sunk due to some errors in the NOTICE and LICENSE files and > some discrepancies between the git source and the source bundle. This new > RC fixes those issues as well as two additional bugs. The release includes > both a source-only release and a convenience binary release. > > The 4.0.0 release has feature parity with our pending 3.0.0 release. New > features include: > - Equi-joins through broadcast hash join > - Shared tables over same physical HBase table > - Read-only and updatable views > - Multi-tenancy > - JDBC ARRAY type > - Sequence creation and usage > > The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc can be found at: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/phoenix/phoenix-4.0.0-incubating-rc2/src/ > > The binary artifacts can be found at: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/phoenix/phoenix-4.0.0-incubating-rc2/bin/ > > Release artifacts are signed with the following key: > https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/mujtaba.asc > > KEYS file available here: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/phoenix/KEYS > > The hash and tag to be voted on: > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-phoenix.git;a=commit;h=64c83beb345a24933f45ba34f0f15b85d6644f7d > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-phoenix.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/v4.0.0-incubating-rc2 > > For information about the contents of this release see: > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-phoenix.git;a=log;h=refs/tags/v4.0.0-incubating-rc2 > > Vote will be open for at least 72 hours. Please vote: > > [ ] +1 approve > [ ] +0 no opinion > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > Thanks, > James >