I'll be there.
Ashutosh On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 11:24, Benjamin Reed <[email protected]> wrote: > i'll be there. > > ben > > On 02/03/2011 10:42 AM, Olga Natkovich wrote: >> >> Hi guys, >> >> This is just a reminder that the meeting will be held next Wednesday, 2/9 >> 4-6 pm at Yahoo campus. >> >> If you have not yet responded but planning to attend, please, let me know. >> >> Olga >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Santhosh Srinivasan [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Friday, January 28, 2011 3:36 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: RE: Pig developer meeting in February >> >> I am planning to attend. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Olga Natkovich [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Friday, January 28, 2011 12:58 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: RE: Pig developer meeting in February >> >> I believe we have critical mass so the meeting is on! >> >> If you have not responded yet but planning to attend, please, let me know. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Olga >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Julien Le Dem [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2011 5:21 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: Pig developer meeting in February >> >> Me too. >> Julien >> >> >> On 1/27/11 4:09 PM, "Dmitriy Ryaboy"<[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Ok yeah I'll come :). >> >> >> >> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Olga Natkovich<[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> While there is a lively discussion on this thread, I have not actually >>> gotten any responses to having the meeting with exception of 1 person :). >>> >>> Please, let me know by the end of the week if you are planning to attend. >>> If we don't get at least a few more responses I suggest we postpone >>> the meeting. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Olga >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Dmitriy Ryaboy [mailto:[email protected]] >>> Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2011 6:04 PM >>> To: [email protected] >>> Subject: Re: Pig developer meeting in February >>> >>> Right, we do partition filtering, but not true predicate pushdown. >>> >>> On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 5:59 PM, Daniel Dai<[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Are you talking about LoadMetadata.setPartitionFilter? >>>> PartitionFilterOptimizer will do that. >>>> >>>> Daniel >>>> >>>> >>>> Dmitriy Ryaboy wrote: >>>> >>>>> I may be wrong but I think predicate pushdown is designed for, but >>>>> not actually implemented in the current LoadPushdown interface (you >>>>> can only push projections). If I am wrong, that's great.. but if >>>>> not, that would >>> >>> be >>>>> >>>>> an important feature to add, as people are trying to connect Pig to >>>>> "smart" >>>>> storage systems like rdbmses, HBase, and Cassandra more and more. >>>>> I >>> >>> think >>>>> >>>>> we only kind of simulate this with partition keys info, which is >>>>> not always sufficient >>>>> >>>>> D >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 2:41 PM, Julien Le Dem >>>>> <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> If making Pig Thread safe (i.e.: two threads running a different >>>>>> pig >>>>>> script) is important then we need to change some of the APIs from >>> >>> static >>>>>> >>>>>> singleton access to a dependency injection pattern. >>>>>> In that case, this should probably be done before 1.0 For example: >>>>>> UDFContext should be passed to the UDF after construction (similar >>>>>> to the SevrletContext in Servlet or the way Hadoop passes the >>>>>> context to tasks) Also a clearly separated API that does not >>>>>> depend on the Pig implementation would help. >>>>>> For example UDFContext is in org.apache.pig.impl.util when it >>>>>> would be better in org.apache.pig.api (Or at least an interface >>>>>> defining it) >>>>>> >>>>>> Julien >>>>>> >>>>>> On 1/24/11 10:14 AM, "Olga Natkovich"<[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi Guys, >>>>>> >>>>>> I think it is time for us to have another meeting. Yahoo would be >>>>>> happy to host if this works for everybody. How about Wednesday, >>>>>> 2/9 4-6 pm. >>>>>> Please, >>>>>> let us know if you are planning to attend and if the date/time >>>>>> works >>> >>> for >>>>>> >>>>>> you. >>>>>> >>>>>> Things that come to mind to discuss and as always feel free to >>>>>> suggest >>>>>> others: >>>>>> >>>>>> - Error handling proposal - this might be easier to finalize >>>>>> face-to-face >>>>>> - Pig 0.9 plan >>>>>> - Pig Roadmap beyond 0.9 >>>>>> o What do we want to do in Pig.next? >>>>>> o Are we ready for Pig 1.0 >>>>>> >>>>>> Olga >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> > >
