[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-1860?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12996640#comment-12996640
]
Olga Natkovich commented on PIG-1860:
-------------------------------------
I am ok with this patch as the short-term fix for 0.8 However, we need to
revisit this for 0.9 there are a couple of things in our current approach that
seems strange to me:
(1) That now we log temp jobs that failed but not the ones that succeed
(2) That reporting an error is so tightly connected with reporting stats for
the store
> Bug in plan built for Nested foreach
> -------------------------------------
>
> Key: PIG-1860
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-1860
> Project: Pig
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 0.8.0, 0.9.0
> Reporter: Vivek Padmanabhan
>
> Using the same inputs as in PIG-1858,
> {code}
> register myanotherudf.jar;
> A = load 'myinput' using PigStorage() as (
> date:chararray,bcookie:chararray,count:int,avg:double,pvs:int);
> B = foreach A generate (int)(avg / 100.0) * 100 as avg, pvs;
> C = group B by ( avg );
> D = foreach C {
> Pvs = order B by pvs;
> Const = org.vivek.MyAnotherUDF(Pvs.pvs).(count,sum);
> generate Const.sum as sum;
> };
> store D into 'out_D';
> {code}
> In this script even though I am passing Pvs.pvs to the UDF in the nested
> foreach, at runtime the "avg" is getting passed.
> It looks like the logical plan created for D is wrong.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
