PIG-1782 isn't a P1, but I'd like to see it committed soon if possible. We've been testing it quite a bit and it's been working well.
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 9:42 AM, Olga Natkovich <[email protected]> wrote: > I think we should minimize changes to the 0.8 branch to only be P1 bugs > meaning failures without workaround that users are likely to encounter or > silent failures. So we should add this one if it does meet the criteria. > Otherwise it should be part of 0.9. > > Olga > > -----Original Message----- > From: Julien Le Dem [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Saturday, March 19, 2011 11:09 PM > To: [email protected] > Cc: Jianyong Dai > Subject: Re: Prepare for Pig 0.8.1 release > > I'd like to add PIG-1923 > I've fixed it in trunk, it should not be too hard to port it to the 0.8 > branch. > Julien > > On 3/17/11 9:33 PM, "Dmitriy Ryaboy" <[email protected]> wrote: > > So happy to hear we are on the same page with this! I was about to suggest > that we cut 0.8.1 soon, as well. > > I haven't opened a Jira, but the HBaseStorage release notes for 0.8 didn't > make it into the documentation -- we should add that to the release. > > I'd really like to get PIG-1870 fixed, it could cause serious issues for > people. I have very little time for it right now myself, unfortunately. > > The PigStorageSchema patch is ready to go, I'll commit it later tonight to > both trunk and 0.8 > > D > > On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 8:32 PM, Daniel Dai <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi, Pig developer >> Since Pig 0.8.0 release, we have fixed quite a few bugs. Now it is a good >> time to plan another Pig 0.8 release. We hope to push the release in one to >> two weeks. We still have a couple of bugs planning to fix (PIG-1892, maybe >> PIG-1912, PIG-1895, PIG-1814, PIG-1826) before release. Besides that, does >> anybody has some patches wants to get in? >> >> Thanks >> Daniel >> > >
