Except for data analysts who use it to actually sample a portion of partially processed data into something like R. I'll certainly be using a patched release if this is not in. Is there plans to do a bugfix release for 0.9? Or is the general feeling that a short cycle 0.10 is likely?
On 6/23/11 2:56 PM, "Olga Natkovich" <[email protected]> wrote: >My experience with sample command is that people use it for some quick >testing and debugging not for production problems. This issue has been >there since the initial introduction of sample. I still don't see a >strong need to hold the beta release for it. > >Olga > >-----Original Message----- >From: Dmitriy Ryaboy [mailto:[email protected]] >Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2011 10:14 AM >To: [email protected] >Cc: [email protected] >Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Pig 0.9.0 (candidate 0) > >There is a workaround - turning off optimizations, or at least >pushUpFilter. I haven't checked 8 with the new logical plan disabled, >that may work too. >If this failed execution, I'd let it pass since there is a workaround, >but as is it silently returns incorrect data, with no way for an analyst >to know her statistics are now fundamentally wrong. Silent and subtle >data corruption is just about the wrist big we can have. >I can't really block the release, you guys can outvote me. But I'd rather >you didn't; we can patch this problem today. > >On Jun 23, 2011, at 7:47 AM, Alan Gates <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Are you referring to PIG-2137? I have a few of questions on that >>before I vote for this release candidate or to reroll. >> >> Is this a new issue introduced in 0.9? >> >> Is there a workaround for this? >> >> We have already discussed that 0.9.0 will be beta quality, and a follow >>up release will be needed as users find bugs. As sample is not a >>heavily used feature I am inclined to view this bug as ok. You feel >>this is serious enough to block a beta release? >> >> Alan. >> >> On Jun 22, 2011, at 9:11 PM, Dmitriy Ryaboy wrote: >> >>> -1 >>> >>> I discovered a critical bug in how SAMPLE is treated; I don't think we >>> should release until it's fixed (Thejas is testing the fix). >>> >>> D >>> >>> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 5:56 PM, Olga Natkovich <[email protected]> >>>wrote: >>> >>>> I have created a candidate build for Pig 0.9.0 release. This release >>>> introduces control structures, changes query parser, and performs >>>>semantic >>>> cleanup. >>>> >>>> The rat report showed no issues in Java files outside of build >>>>directory. >>>> >>>> >>>> Keys used to sign the release are available at >>>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Please try it out: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-0.9.0-candidate-0/ >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Build is also available in maven: >>>> >>>>https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachepig-042/org >>>>/apache/pig/pig/0.9.0/ >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Should we release this? Vote closes on Monday, June 27. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Olga >>>> >>>> >>
