Hi, Russell,
Seems possible. You already had a patch, if you can add a test case in a
day or two, then we can review and check in.

Thanks,
Daniel

On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 7:12 PM, Russell Jurney <[email protected]>wrote:

> Any chance to get PIG-2411 in there? :)
>
> Russell Jurney
> twitter.com/rjurney
> [email protected]
> datasyndrome.com
>
> On Jan 9, 2012, at 5:47 PM, Dmitriy Ryaboy <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Jonathan is working on PIG-2428: In pig9, can't have limit(order by)
> > without getting a null error. This is a syntactic regression from 0.8,
> > and should be fixed. He has the patch but can't get tests to finish at
> > the moment (see the other thread about that).
> >
> > I can't recall any other issues I'd consider blocking. Was actually
> > going to send this same email later this week :).
> >
> > We have 0.9.2 in production as of last week, it's chugging along
> > nicely. It'll be a nice stability upgrade for Pig users.
> >
> > -Dmitriy
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Daniel Dai <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >> Hi, Pig developers,
> >>
> >> We have fixed a bunch of bugs since 0.9.1 (
> >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/pig/branches/branch-0.9/CHANGES.txt). I
> >> would propose a 0.9.2 release in a couple days. Here are the issues we
> >> still try to get in:
> >>
> >> PIG-2342: Pig tutorial documentation needs to update about building
> tutorial
> >> PIG-2413: e2e test should support testing against two cluster
> >> PIG-2172: Fix test failure for ant 1.8.x
> >> PIG-2431: Upgrade bundled hadoop version to 1.0.0
> >> PIG-2462: getWrappedSplit is incorrectly returning the fist split
> instead
> >> of the current split
> >>
> >> Anything else?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Daniel
>

Reply via email to