Sounds good to me.
My thoughts on the costs of this change -
- svn will still retain the history of the moved files. So that is not a
problem.
- build.xml would need some minor changes
- some extra steps will be required to apply the patches generated
against old directory structure.
Thanks,
Thejas
On 3/15/12 5:54 PM, Bill Graham wrote:
+1 for src/main/ruby and src/main/java.
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 5:22 PM, Jonathan Coveney<jcove...@gmail.com>wrote:
So with the jruby addition (which I'm putting a cherry on top of as we
speak!), there's going to be some source files in ruby. Given that we don't
currently have (afaik) any code in languages other than java, there isn't a
clear place to put this. The files are such that they can be packaged in
pig.jar and referenced via that (hooray for jruby), but we need a home for
them.
The ideal would be src/main/ruby/, and move all the java to src/main/java/,
but this seems like a pretty traumatic change at this point to accomodate
one file...even if we add some python and more ruby files, it doesn't seem
worth killing old patches.
We could also do src-ruby in the base dir and just go from there?
Thoughts?
Jon
