I'd like to but it's a huge project. We need to figure out what each test is doing and put them in the right package. We need to split/merge lots of test, also there are many tests cross packages, we need to figure a way to deal with it.
Daniel On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Bill Graham <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > Is there a good reason why almost all pig tests live in org.apache.pig.test > and not in the package of the class they're testing? This approach means > that many methods need to be made public just for testing instead of > package private. It also makes it harder to find tests in a package with > 212 classes in it. > > What would people feel about changing this standard to put test classes in > the package name of the class you're testing? It would be great to move > classes to new packages, but then there's that whole breaking patches > part... > > thanks, > Bill
