Thanks for the reply. Unfortunately I saw it only after the proposal edit deadline has passed.
>I would focus on the functionality demonstrated in Figure 1 of the PigPen >SIGMOD paper I’ll start reading the paper. >There are existing javascript IDEs such as Cloud 9 (source) I am familiar with online IDEs. As I mentioned briefly in the proposal, I was involved in initializing such a project called ‘gadget ide’ [1] at WSO2. It is a graph based IDE aimed at dashboard authoring via specifying data flows, which is a fairly large project (8000+ JavaScript SLOC). > If you do go for a full-blown IDE, I suggest you do it as a stretch goal Of cause, I am planning to be more focused on the visualization of commands. I have mentioned the IDE, only as a possible future extension. I didn’t include it in the project timeline, but if time allows I am happy to attempt it. But as you have mentioned, the visualization part itself is considerably large project. >I would encourage you to re-scope your proposal I was expecting EXPLAIN to be the major problem. I wasn’t anticipating ILLUSTRATE to be hard command to visualize. If so, I’d like to re-scope the project as you have suggested. How about completing the ILLUSTRATE before the mid evaluation, and pushing down the plan visualize to second phase? Will that allocation be enough? I may have to cut back a little on the interactive features of the graphs. Please provide your suggestions on this matter. I am aware that the team is busy with 0.10, so thanks for taking time to provide feedback. [1] (Last two screen shots are most relevant) http://mackiemathew.com/2012/01/21/a-revolution-with-business-activity-monitor-bam-2-0/ -- by, Manu (R Chathura Manuranga Perera)
