JRuby gems in JRuby UDFs is a new feature and I'd like it to go in 0.11.

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-2927

Russell Jurney http://datasyndrome.com

On Oct 22, 2012, at 1:17 PM, Olga Natkovich <onatkov...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> There are still 76 unresolved JIRAs more than half unassigned. Lets clean 
> this up by theend of this week. I propose we do the following:
>
> (1) Unlink all JIRAs for new features since we already branched so we should 
> not be taken on new work. If people feel strongly that some new features 
> still need to go in please bring it up.
> (2) For bug fixes, if people fill strongly that some of the unassigned issues 
> need to be addressed please take ownership. If you are unable to solve them 
> but still feel they are important, please, bring them up.
> (3) Owners of unresolved issues, please, take a look if you will have time to 
> solve them in the next 2 weeks. If not, lets move them to 12. If you can't 
> address them but feel they are important, please, bring it up.
>
> Lets make sure that all JIRAs that require changes to the documentation have 
> appropriate information in the release notes section so that we can quickly 
> compile release documentation.
>
> Thanks for you help!
>
> Olga
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Alan Gates <ga...@hortonworks.com>
> To: dev@pig.apache.org
> Sent: Monday, October 15, 2012 11:55 AM
> Subject: Re: Pig 0.11
>
> At this point no one has taken on release documentation for 0.11.
>
> Alan.
>
> On Oct 15, 2012, at 11:49 AM, Olga Natkovich wrote:
>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Are you talking about items 15 and 16 on the How To Release.Publish  page?
>>
>> Also, who is doing release documentation these days? I can help with that as 
>> well. I would also be happy to roll the release if you guys need help with 
>> that.
>>
>> Olga
>>
>>
>> ________________________________
>> From: Dmitriy Ryaboy <dvrya...@gmail.com>
>> To: "dev@pig.apache.org" <dev@pig.apache.org>
>> Cc: "dev@pig.apache.org" <dev@pig.apache.org>
>> Sent: Friday, October 12, 2012 5:59 PM
>> Subject: Re: Pig 0.11
>>
>> Thanks Olga and welcome back!
>> I know there's some process for linking jiras to releases, but I'm not sure 
>> what that is. If you could explain and maybe cover a portion of that work, 
>> that'd be super helpful. And reviews, of course.
>>
>> On Oct 12, 2012, at 2:06 PM, Olga Natkovich <onatkov...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Dmitry, I would be happy to help with the release process. Want to get back 
>>> into this now that I am back at work. Let me know what you would like me to 
>>> do.
>>>
>>> Olga
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ________________________________
>>> From: Dmitriy Ryaboy <dvrya...@gmail.com>
>>> To: dev@pig.apache.org
>>> Cc: billgra...@gmail.com
>>> Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2012 2:44 PM
>>> Subject: Re: Pig 0.11
>>>
>>> Ok I will branch 0.11 tomorrow morning unless someone objects.
>>> From then on, committers should be careful to commit bug fixes to both
>>> 0.11 branch and trunk; minor polish can go into the branch, but whole
>>> new features should not (we can discuss on the list if something is in
>>> the gray area).
>>>
>>> D
>>>
>>> On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Gianmarco De Francisci Morales
>>> <g...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>> I added it as a dependency as it has already its own Jira.
>>>> I hope it is OK.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> --
>>>> Gianmarco
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 11:23 PM, Bill Graham <billgra...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1 for me.
>>>>>
>>>>> There's https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-2756 which tracks a few
>>>>> documentation issues that should block Pig 0.11, but they can also be done
>>>>> on the trunk and merged to the branch. Gianmarco, you can add a rank
>>>>> subtask there to serve as a reminder.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 11:03 PM, Gianmarco De Francisci Morales <
>>>>> g...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> We are missing some documentation on the RANK but I guess we could add
>>>>> that
>>>>>> to the branch and trunk in parallel.
>>>>>> All the patches I was keeping an eye on are in.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So +1 for me.
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Gianmarco
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 5:31 PM, Jonathan Coveney <jcove...@gmail.com
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I think all of the major patches are in, no? Now it's just bug testing?
>>>>>>> Just wanted to touch base on where we are at with this.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> *Note that I'm no longer using my Yahoo! email address. Please email me at
>>>>> billgra...@gmail.com going forward.*

Reply via email to