Yes, it is Ok with me. Daniel
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Julien Le Dem <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 > The full test suite is passing. > I don't think we need not make a new rc just for one license header missing. > Daniel, is it OK for you ? > Thanks, > Julien > > On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Daniel Dai <[email protected]> wrote: >> My fault for missing license header for >> UDFContextTestLoaderWithSignature. Added it to both files, Thanks >> Prashant! >> >> I run unit tests/e2e tests, both passed. +1 for the rc except for the >> license header issue. >> >> Daniel >> >> On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 11:18 PM, Prashant Kommireddi >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Downloaded tarball and performed the following: >>> >>> 1. ant releaseaudit - UDFContextTestLoaderWithSignature ( >>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=r1458036) and >>> DOTParser.jjt do not have Apache License header. >>> 2. Verified RELEASE_NOTES.txt for correct version numbers >>> 3. Verified build.xml points to next version (0.11.2) SNAPSHOT >>> 4. Built and tested Piggybank, Built tutorial - looks good. >>> 5. Tested jar by running scripts against 0.20.2 hadoop cluster (would be >>> great to have someone else test the same) >>> 6. ant test-commit - all tests pass >>> >>> Except for #1, RC looks good to me. >>> Thanks, >>> -Prashant >>> >>> On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 7:58 AM, Bill Graham <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I have created a candidate build for Pig 0.11.1. This is a maintenance >>>> release >>>> of Pig 0.11. >>>> >>>> Keys used to sign the release are available at: >>>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup >>>> >>>> Please download, test, and try it out: >>>> http://people.apache.org/~billgraham/pig-0.11.1-candidate-0/ >>>> >>>> Should we release this? Vote closes on next Thursday EOD, Mar 28th. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Bill >>>>
