-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11355/#review21315
-----------------------------------------------------------



http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/pig/trunk/contrib/piggybank/java/src/main/java/org/apache/pig/piggybank/storage/avro/PigSchema2Avro.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/11355/#comment44213>

    Initialize defaultValue in a variable and pass defaultValue instead of 
doing a if else condition.



http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/pig/trunk/contrib/piggybank/java/src/test/java/org/apache/pig/piggybank/test/storage/avro/TestAvroStorage.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/11355/#comment44215>

    Isn't a load and store enough to reproduce the test case? Why such a long 
pig script? Please try to keep the unit tests simple.


- Rohini Palaniswamy


On May 30, 2013, 2:29 a.m., Viraj Bhat wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/11355/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated May 30, 2013, 2:29 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for pig and Rohini Palaniswamy.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Patch to write default values to the Schema when the writer schema contains 
> that in the AvroStorage.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/pig/trunk/contrib/piggybank/java/src/main/java/org/apache/pig/piggybank/storage/avro/PigSchema2Avro.java
>  1485826 
>   
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/pig/trunk/contrib/piggybank/java/src/test/java/org/apache/pig/piggybank/test/storage/avro/TestAvroStorage.java
>  1485826 
>   
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/pig/trunk/contrib/piggybank/java/src/test/java/org/apache/pig/piggybank/test/storage/avro/avro_test_files/numbers.txt
>  PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11355/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Yes against the Piggybank  in Pig trunk/Pig 0.12
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Viraj Bhat
> 
>

Reply via email to