Ok. I will start a vote today and get back to you in few days.
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 1:28 AM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho <jar...@apache.org> wrote: > I would second Mayur - as he and Praveen are most familiar with all the > changes, I would let them be the only additional branch committers. I’m > expecting that they will review other contributor's patches similarly as > normal committers and hence the contributors will start building Karma to > get the “branch committership” later as well (if the branch will be around > for that long). > > Jarcec > > On Aug 26, 2014, at 9:04 AM, Mayur Rustagi <ma...@sigmoidanalytics.com> > wrote: > > > Praveen & me should be good enough for us. We will have 1-2 more folks > > contributing from Sigmoid but we can manage by merging patches from them. > > > > Initially it will be good to structure patches through us as we > > would like to avoid breaking architecture & flow. > > > > Regards > > Mayur > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 8:27 AM, Cheolsoo Park <piaozhe...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > >> Hi guys, > >> > >> I asked about branch committership to the infra mailing list, and here > is > >> the reply- > >> > >> Many projects have what they consider 'partial committers' that is > >> folks who have access to specific parts of a projects svn tree. Some > >> projects do this for GSoC participants, others as a mechanism for > >> moving to 'full committership' within the project. > >> > >> Do note though that in the eyes of the ASF someone with an ICLA and an > >> account with any permissions to commit code anywhere in the public svn > >> tree is a committer. IOW, you would vote, have ICLAs filed, and > >> request account creation as per normal, and then merely adjust the > >> karma in asf-authorization-template (and or LDAP) > >> > >> > >> Looks like we need to vote and follow the normal process just like any > >> other new committer. > >> > >> @Praveen, Jacec, > >> I think Mayur and Praveen from Sigmoid Analytics need branch > committership. > >> Will anyone else work on Pig-on-Spark? Please reply. > >> > >> Once I have a full list of people, I will open a vote for Pig PMCs. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Cheolsoo > >> > >> > >> On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 11:51 AM, Cheolsoo Park <piaozhe...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> Additionally, I will give "branch-specific" commit permission to people > >>> who will work on Pig on Spark (assuming it is possible). > >>> > >>> Please let me know if you have any objection on this too. > >>> > >>> > >>> On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 10:25 AM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho < > jar...@apache.org> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>>> No objections from my side, thank you for creating the branch Cheolsoo > >>>> and kudos to the Sigmoid Analytics team for the great work! > >>>> > >>>> Jarcec > >>>> > >>>> On Aug 25, 2014, at 7:14 PM, Cheolsoo Park <piaozhe...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Hi devs, > >>>>> > >>>>> Sigmoid Analytics has been working on Pig-on-Spark (PIG-4059), and > >> they > >>>> want to merge their work into Apache. > >>>>> > >>>>> I am going to create a "Spark" branch for them. Please let me know if > >>>> you have any concerns. > >>>>> > >>>>> Thanks, > >>>>> Cheolsoo > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Regards, > > Mayur Rustagi > > Ph: +1 (760) 203 3257 > > http://www.sigmoidanalytics.com > > @mayur_rustagi <http://www.twitter.com/mayur_rustagi> > >
