Thanks Xiang! I've verified both the binary and source distributions locally, and everything looks good.
+1 (binding) On Mon, Jun 1, 2026 at 3:47 PM Xiang Fu <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > This is a call for a vote to release Apache Pinot 1.5.1 RC0. > > 1.5.1 is a security patch release cut from the 1.5.0 tag. It bumps four > dependencies to close the critical/high CVEs reported in > https://github.com/apache/pinot/issues/18593: > > - netty 4.1.122.Final -> 4.1.134.Final > (CVE-2025-55163, CVE-2025-59419, CVE-2026-33870, CVE-2026-33871, > CVE-2026-42579, CVE-2026-42583, CVE-2026-42584, CVE-2026-42587) > - log4j-core 2.25.3 -> 2.26.0 > (CVE-2026-34478, CVE-2026-34479, CVE-2026-34480, CVE-2026-34481) > - async-http-client 3.0.7 -> 3.0.10 (CVE-2026-45300) > - httpclient5 5.6 -> 5.6.1 (CVE-2026-40542) > > Known exception: the Jetty CVE-2026-2332 (request smuggling) is NOT > addressed in this release. The Jetty 9.4.x branch is end-of-life with no > patch available (advisory GHSA-355h-qmc2-wpwf; only Jetty 12.0.33/12.1.7 > are fixed). Jetty here is a managed dependency for the optional > Hadoop/Spark/Pulsar plugins only -- Pinot's own HTTP layer uses > Grizzly/Jersey -- and closing the CVE requires a Jetty 9->12 migration, > which is out of scope for a patch release. > > The release candidate: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/pinot/apache-pinot-1.5.1-rc0/ > > Git tag: > https://github.com/apache/pinot/releases/tag/release-1.5.1-rc0 > Git hash: 01e10f352b (tag release-1.5.1-rc0) > > The Nexus staging repository: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachepinot-1080 > > Keys to verify the signature of the release artifacts: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/pinot/KEYS > > Release notes / diff vs 1.5.0: > https://github.com/apache/pinot/releases/tag/release-1.5.1 > > Documentation on how to verify a release candidate: > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/PINOT/Validating+a+release+candidate > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until the necessary number > of votes are reached. > > Please vote accordingly: > [ ] +1 approve > [ ] +0 no opinion > [ ] -1 disapprove (and the reason why) > > Thanks, > Xiang Fu >
