Ok - let's take a close look at Google Caliper (unless anyone has a better option) and see if we can go ahead and port
On Sun, Jul 17, 2016 at 12:03 PM, Suneel Marthi <[email protected]> wrote: > I completely agree that we should port that code to Google Caliper. > > The benchmarking code wasn't a high priority for Flink project and hence > they chose to just remove the code. > > The alternatives to JMH are - Google Caliper and Metrics ( > http://metrics.dropwizard.io/3.1.0/) and anything else folks are aware of > ?? > > My personal preference would be Google Caliper, we had used that in the > past to micro-benchmark Mahout's legacy Math Linear Algebra backend. > > Suneel > > > > On Sun, Jul 17, 2016 at 11:57 AM, Ellison Anne Williams < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > Suneel -- Thanks for creating the JIRA issue and pointing out the > licensing > > problems. I see that JMH is under the GNU GPL2 ( > > http://openjdk.java.net/legal/) which is not compatible with the Apache > > license (http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html). > > > > It appears that Flink just removed the benchmarking code instead of > > re-porting it to another option. > > > > I would like us to port it to another license-compatible benchmarking > > framework such as Google Caliper (or something similar) instead of > removing > > the code as the benchmarking is important for encryption optimization. > > > > Thoughts? > > > > Thanks! > > > > Ellison Anne > > >
