Thanks Tim.

Next Steps to move forward with the Release (for the Release Manager):

1. Merge PR#80 and PR#79 to codebase.

2. Respond to general@ that we'll be pushing new artifacts with updated
ReadMe.

3. Drop the existing Staging artifacts from Nexus

4. Rollback the present Release.

5. Create a new Release Candidate

Since its only a ReadMe change, I don't think we need to go thru Voting
time and it should suffice to pass the Release once we have the minimum
required 3 +1s.

For the Release Manager: please read my comments in PR#70 and modify the
local settings.xml accordingly. It would be a good idea to go thru a DryRun
locally first.



On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 7:28 AM, Tim Ellison <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 25/08/16 01:26, Ellison Anne Williams wrote:
> > Yes, as per http://www.apache.org/dev/crypto.html --
> >
> > The code falls under ECCN 5D002, so we are good there.
> >
> > We need to:
> >
> > (1) Notify the USG via the sending the specified email
>
> Done.  I cc:'d the dev list, but it may be stuck in moderation.
>
> > (2) Add a README containing the crypto -- Do we have to go through the
> > entire voting process again internally since we are adding a file to the
> > source release?
>
> See PR#80.  Yep, I'm afraid we will have to re-spin the build :-(
>
> Apologies for not thinking of export classification earlier, it is
> something I have done a few times before too.  Please add a line to the
> Release Guide to consider whether there needs an update the export page.
>
> > (3) Edit the export list to add Pirk here
> > http://www.apache.org/licenses/exports/ -- Who (of our PPMC) has access
> to
> > edit the page? I don't think that I do as it says that anyone with
> 'site-dev
> > karma' can edit and, as far as I know, I don't have site-dev karma.
>
> Done, see http://www.apache.org/licenses/exports/
>
> Regards,
> Tim
>
> > On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 8:15 PM, Suneel Marthi <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 8:13 PM, Ellison Anne Williams <
> >> [email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Got it - will take care of it tonight/in the morning and report back to
> >>> general@incubator
> >>>
> >>> I'd better notify the USG of the crypto - lol :)
> >>>
> >>
> >> That's the part that had me laughing, all of this source code came out
> of
> >> USG and we are being told to check with USG again.
> >>
> >> At the very least we may need to add Pirk to the list of exports - (4),
> for
> >> Justin to reverse his -1
> >>
> >>
> >>> On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 8:00 PM, Suneel Marthi <
> [email protected]>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Fyi folks
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> >>>> From: Justin Mclean <[email protected]>
> >>>> Date: Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 7:48 PM
> >>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Pirk 0.1.0-incubating Release
> >>>> To: [email protected]
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi,
> >>>>
> >>>> -1 binding, willing to change my vote if encryption code issue
> >> clarified.
> >>>>
> >>>>> The artifacts can be downloaded here: https://repository.apache.org/
> >>>> content/
> >>>>> repositories/orgapachepirk-1002
> >>>>
> >>>> Please place the artefacts in the correct place [1] That that releases
> >>> MUST
> >>>> be placed in the list area and that maven is considered a secondary
> >>>> channel.
> >>>>
> >>>> I checked:
> >>>> - name included incubating
> >>>> - signature and hashes good
> >>>> - DISCLAIMER exists
> >>>> - LICENSE and NOTICE good
> >>>> - No unexpected binary files in release
> >>>> - Can compile from source
> >>>>
> >>>> I see that the release looks to contains encryption source code [2]
> >>>> (Paillier) [5], if so has this process been followed? [3]  I can't see
> >>> Prik
> >>>> listed here [4].
> >>>>
> >>>> Just out of interest why the “wideskies” in the class path name?
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>> Justin
> >>>>
> >>>> 1. https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/pirk/
> >>>> 2. ./src/main/java/org/apache/pirk/encryption/
> >>>> 3. http://www.apache.org/dev/crypto.html
> >>>> 4. http://www.apache.org/licenses/exports/
> >>>> 5. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paillier_cryptosystem
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
>

Reply via email to