+1 - It's my hope that we have cycles to bring it out of retirement at some point
On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 6:52 PM, Josh Elser <[email protected]> wrote: > (forgot to include my) +1 > > > Josh Elser wrote: > >> It seems like the discussion had 1mos+ hasn't resulted in anyone with >> time/ability/interest to continue the podling. >> >> As such, per [1], here's an official VOTE for consensus on retirement >> before we bring this to the IPMC. >> >> +1: I am in favor of retiring the Pirk podling >> -1: I am not in favor of retirement because... >> >> This vote will be left open for at least 72hrs (~2100 2017/03/25 GMT) >> >> - Josh >> >> [1] https://incubator.apache.org/guides/retirement.html >> >
