Files with a .wtkx extension will still work fine. However, the "wtkx" namespace prefix will change to "bxml", the annotation will change to @BXML, and the serializer will change to BeanSerializer, so for consistency I think we'd want to recommend changing the file extension as well. Greg
On Jun 14, 2010, at 4:52 PM, Noel Grandin wrote: > Hi > > I don't have a problem with the version numbering, but is there any > reason why you can't continue to support the WTKX extension for > backwards compatibility? > > -- Noel > > On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 02:13, Greg Brown <gkbr...@mac.com> wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I'd really like to refactor WTKXSerializer to BeanSerializer and move it to >> Pivot Core for the next release. However, I think this change is too >> disruptive for the 1.x line. As a developer, I don't think I would be too >> pleased to discover that I need to update all of my WTKX files to BXML when >> migrating from Pivot 1.5 to Pivot 1.6. As a result, I'd like to suggest that >> the next major version of Pivot be 2.0. >> >> We currently have Pivot 1.5.1 in the pipeline and can do additional point >> releases for 1.5 as needed. We'll reshuffle the items currently assigned to >> 1.6 and 2.0 into 2.0, 2.1, etc. as appropriate. Any objections? >> >> Thanks, >> Greg >> >>
