Not a problem. Thanks for the clarification. :-) On Jun 18, 2010, at 1:33 PM, aappddeevv wrote:
> Not meant to be divisive but a recognition the separation between focus, > needs and economics often creates an intentional gap or a temporary gap but > needs to fulfilled to meet specific end-user needs. > > Never assumed it was going sour. Tension and issues are never inherently bad > but just trade-offs on gaps and planning points to "consumers" of core > libraries like pivot. I can see, however, where the word tension in this > context may have implied something negative. > > Thanks for allowing me to clarify my comments. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Greg Brown [mailto:gkbr...@mac.com] > Sent: Friday, June 18, 2010 10:32 AM > To: dev@pivot.apache.org > Subject: Re: Pivot components & the keyboard > >> I think this is a classic tension between people >> like us and the core library team. > > No offense meant, but this comes across as a bit divisive. There hasn't even > been any real discussion of this issue yet - why would you assume that there > would be tension? > > I'm not saying there won't be any disagreement about approach (to this issue > or others like it), but I'd suggest that we actually have the discussion > before assuming that it is going to go sour. ;-) >
