With respect to this:
> GetQuery:
>
> public <T> T execute() {…}
The bigger question is - does it make sense to make GetQuery a generic? You
can't add an overload as described above because the compiler won't like it -
type erasure will give it the same signature as the one that returns an Object.
The only way to avoid this is to require the caller to specify the type when
constructing the query:
GetQuery<Foo> fooQuery = new GetQuery<Foo>();
Foo foo = fooQuery.execute();
The other query classes already have well-defined parameter types, so this
question really only applies to GetQuery. I'm not necessarily opposed to it -
just thinking out loud.
cc'ing the dev list - comments welcome.
G
