I actually don't think we should release 2.0 until those tickets are resolved. We'd be releasing a major version with known inconsistencies between major components, which is not good.
On Nov 26, 2010, at 4:43 AM, Sandro Martini wrote: > > Hi Greg, > >> Those tickets have been resolved for some components but not yet TreeView. >> Ideally, they should be resolved for TreeView as well before we release >> 2.0. > Yes, so in the worst case maybe we could split them and keep for the 2.1 all > parts still not solved. > >> You are welcome to take a look at them if you have time. However, they are >> fairly involved and since Todd wrote the original code for TreeView, it >> will probably be most efficient for him to resolve them. > I agree, I can try to take a look, but as you know I have little knowledge > of this part of Pivot ... > > Bye, > Sandro > > -- > View this message in context: > http://apache-pivot-developers.417237.n3.nabble.com/Open-tickets-and-a-little-thing-tp1970272p1971882.html > Sent from the Apache Pivot - Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
