Agreed. I have no intention of pushing in any changes before 2.0 is release, with the exception of bug fixes.
Eclipse (pop ups), Opera & Internet Explorer (history) all seem to use scrollbars when necessary, so perhaps it is worth changing. I'll create a JIRA ticket for 2.1 and we can wait and see if anyone feels strongly either way before making a choice. Chris On 4 December 2010 02:25, Greg Brown <[email protected]> wrote: > Aesthetically, I prefer Panorama. It's less clunky than a big vertical > scroll bar. Also, the purpose of a suggestion popup is to allow the user to > narrow down results, such that scrolling often isn't even necessary. > > However, I don't feel strongly about it and would be fine with using a > ScrollPane instead - I don't think we should make this change before 2.0 is > released, though. > > On Dec 3, 2010, at 2:21 PM, Chris Bartlett wrote: > > > Before today I had never looked at SuggestionPopup in any detail, and was > > surprised to see that TerraSuggestionPopupSkin internally uses a Panorama > > rather than a ScrollPane. > > Is there a particular reason for this? > > > > ScrollPane and Panorama seem fairly equivalent in this case, but a > > ScrollPane has the advantage of visually indicating the size of the data > set > > and approximate position within it. > > Is it worth changing to a ScrollPane, or at least providing a style to > allow > > the user to choose which to use? > > > > Chris > >
