Looks like this is the culprit http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1092214 'Eliminate equals() and hashCode() from org.apache.pivot.xml.Element.'
Context here http://apache-pivot-users.399431.n3.nabble.com/TreeView-issue-on-Element-Selection-td2814370.html Greg - Is it just a case of the unit test not being updated along with the commit, or should the assertions in the test case still be valid? On 23 June 2011 02:28, Chris Bartlett <[email protected]> wrote: > BeanAdapterTestObject is not a JUnit test, but its name matches the > inclusion criteria. > <fileset dir="@{project}/test" includes="**/*Test*.java"/> > So I guess it just needs to be renamed. > > XMLSerializerTest *is* a valid test that is failing when checking equality > of Elements. > Anyone done anything related to this recently? > (SVN access is slow for me right now, so checking history is painful) > > Chris > > On 23 June 2011 01:40, Roger L. Whitcomb <[email protected]>wrote: > >> I ran "ant test" against head revs just now and got two failures: >> [junit] Test org.apache.pivot.beans.test.BeanAdapterTestObject FAILED >> [junit] Test org.apache.pivot.xml.test.XMLSerializerTest FAILED >> >> Haven't looked into things further than this. >> >> Roger Whitcomb | Architect, Engineering | [email protected] | >> Ingres | 500 Arguello Street | Suite 200 | Redwood City | CA | 94063 | >> USA +1 650-587-5596 | fax: +1 650-587-5550 >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Chris Bartlett [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 11:29 AM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: 2.0.1 release >> >> Yep, 6 months is way too long, but with only a few committers whose time >> is >> limited, it has just ended up that way. >> >> Hopefully Piotr's road map question and Greg's friendly push will be >> enough >> to kick start the 2.0.1 process.. >> >> On 23 June 2011 01:20, Edvin Syse <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > I think 6 months is long between each release, but if you release >> snapshots >> > atleast each month and update the webpage to show info on the latest >> > snapshot, you can atleast show that the project is moving forward :) >> > >> > Den 22.06.2011 20:04, skrev Chris Bartlett: >> > >> > I'm not sure there would be enough changes to justify official >> *releases* >> >> as >> >> regularly as one per month, but I imagine that regular snapshot >> builds >> >> could >> >> be made available for download. >> >> >> >> http://ci.apache.org/ >> >> I will try to read up on what is available to us. >> >> >> >> Chris >> >> >> >> >> >> On 23 June 2011 00:16, Greg Brown<[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >> Get the latest source from SVN and build/test the release artifacts >> (run >> >>> the demos/tutorials/test apps and make sure that nothing is broken). >> Once >> >>> validated, a release vote can be called for (though a PMC member >> will >> >>> need >> >>> to do that part). >> >>> >> >>> Releasing once a month would be aggressive. But if someone is >> willing to >> >>> take responsibility for it, I don't see any reason why not. >> >>> >> >>> On Jun 22, 2011, at 12:42 PM, Andrei Pozolotin wrote: >> >>> >> >>> what is involved in "get the ball rolling"? >> >>>> >> >>>> can you start releasing 2.0.x versions once a month? >> >>>> >> >>>> -------- Original Message -------- >> >>>> Subject: 2.0.1 release >> >>>> From: Greg Brown<[email protected]> >> >>>> To: Pivot Dev<[email protected]> >> >>>> Date: Wed 22 Jun 2011 10:16:40 AM CDT >> >>>> >> >>>>> Hi all, >> >>>>> >> >>>>> I think the 2.0.1 release is long overdue. Open-source projects >> without >> >>>>> >> >>>> frequent releases seem dead and lose users. >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>>>> I unfortunately cannot drive the process, but I can help validate >> the >> >>>>> >> >>>> release if someone is willing to get the ball rolling. Are there >> any >> >>> volunteers? >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>>>> Greg >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >> >> > >
