> Den 08.07.2011 21:04, skrev Greg Brown: >> Sorry, I wasn't clear either. :-) I should have asked "what do you mean by >> 'it'"? In other words, what do you think breaks the contract defined by >> Serializer? > > That's what I tried to say with this sentence: > > "If you write an object you expect to get the same object back when you read > back the stream you wrote earlier. If you add some mutator to it, that's not > serialization anymore, that's something else IMHO".
Right, I read that but I wasn't sure what you were getting at. What specifically do you think would violate this reciprocity?
