Thanks, Greg. We're still debating internally about the best thing to do, but I wanted to make sure this was an option (or not).
Roger Whitcomb -----Original Message----- From: Greg Brown [mailto:gk_br...@verizon.net] Sent: Monday, April 30, 2012 10:47 AM To: dev@pivot.apache.org Subject: Re: Can I rename the release .jar files? I don't believe there are any legal issues regarding file names. As I recall, we chose to include the version number in the file name simply because it is a common convention to do so (and also because Maven requires it). G On Apr 30, 2012, at 12:54 PM, Roger L. Whitcomb wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Just a legal question: is it permissible under the > Apache license to ship with renamed Pivot .jar files? The reason I'm > asking is that I'm debating whether to ship with the released 2.0.1 > files or with pre-release 2.0.2 ones and it would be easier for our > release/upgrade processes if the files didn't have the version number in > the names. But, it is not clear to me whether shipping with renamed > files is okay under the Apache license. Anyone have an idea about this? > Or who I should talk to? > > > > Thanks. > > ~Roger Whitcomb >
