Hi, I agree and I think its important to tag it as it really was an intersting step.
Julian Am 25.06.19, 09:57 schrieb "Markus Sommer" <[email protected]>: +1 Freundliche Grüße Markus Sommer Geschäftsführer isb innovative software businesses GmbH Otto-Lilienthal-Strasse 2 D - 88046 Friedrichshafen Tel.: +49 (0) 7541 3834-14 Mob: +49 (0) 171 537 8437 Fax: +49 (0) 7541 3834-20 E-Mail: [email protected] Web: www.isb-fn.de Geschäftsführer: Markus Sommer, Thomas Zeler Sitz: Friedrichshafen Registergericht: Amtsgericht Ulm HRB-Nr. 631624 Important Note: This e-mail and any attachments are confidential, may contain trade secrets and may well also be legally privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you have received it in error, you are on notice of its status. Please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and then delete his e-mail and any attachment from your system. If you are not the intended recipient please understand that you must not copy this e-mail or any attachments or disclose the contents to any other person. Thank you. -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Christofer Dutz <[email protected]> Gesendet: Dienstag, 25. Juni 2019 09:42 An: [email protected] Betreff: [DISCUSS] Retire Daffodil and SCXML? Hi all, I would like to start to move the new code generation outside the sandbox. For this I would like to replace the existing code-generation modules. We currently have the dynamic driver modules, which were a proof of concept and have proven to be technically interesting, but performance-wise dead ends. I would like to tag the revision with “last-dafodil” and get rid of them. What do you think? Chris
