+1 for rekeased branch so this branch indicates that this is the current release branch. For specific versions we have the rel/0.7
Am Mo., 15. Juni 2020 um 16:08 Uhr schrieb Christofer Dutz < [email protected]>: > Hi all, > > I would like to take the opportunity to discuss with you, if we should > perhaps change the name of our “master” branch. > > I do know that currently the discussion is mainly based on the fact that > for some people “master” seems to imply “slave” and this sort of maps to > other cultural issues that might come up in conjunction with this. My > suggestion actually doesn’t have anything to do with this reasoning, even > if the thought was indeed sparked by this discussion. And if in the end it > makes more people happy, that’s an even bigger benefit. > > The main reason is that I am working on a lot of project and every project > sort of handles branch names differently. Some develop on “master” and > release in release branches, some develop on “develop” and release to > master etc. > > I really like developing on “develop” … the name of the branch sort of > set’s what it’s used for … same with release and feature branches … however > “master” sort of always droped out of this pattern. > > So I would like to suggest we rename “master” to “release(d)” … this way > every new contributor will automatically know what’s used for what. > > What do you think? > > Chris >
