Makes sense. +1
Regards - Avik On Friday 29 Jun 2007 8:35:31 pm Nick Burch wrote: > On Fri, 29 Jun 2007, Yegor Kozlov wrote: > > +1 > > if the release will be not earlier than in two weeks. > > Ideally it'll be ASAP. There are a few issues with 3.0 that I'd really > like to see fixed, especially the fact that a lot of the file and > directory names in 3.0 are labelled after the release candidate. > > We can always do another relase later, but I'd like people upgrading to > 3.0.x to download something that has all the right filenames in it. > > > Also, I will try to reduce the number of javadoc errors. > > I've had a blast through the ones which were repeated mistakes, and got > the number down quite a bit. It'd be great if you could fix the remaining > ones :) > > Nick > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
