DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43434>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43434 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |RESOLVED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-08 09:23 ------- I don't think we will implement this Named ranges can be fantastically complicated, and for a case like: Sheet1!A1:A5,Sheet1!B2,B3,Sheet2!A1,A5 If you shift the third row of sheet 1 down, you'll have to split the named ranges up even further (since A3 and B3 have moved elsewhere, and your range is even less contiguous). I think this is a case where the person doing the shifting will know much more about their named ranges than we ever could, so they should be deciding what (if anything) ought to be updated. (eg in this example, perhaps you want the named range to still point to the new empty third row that you're about to fill, not to where the data went, and how are we to know that) -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
