The code for POISSON should be stable over time.  The poisson
distribution has a very simple definition that should be easy to test
(and we should).  I guess the the complexity in the common-math
version is there for optimisation reasons.  Unless we have better data
on how the Excel version of POISSON is generally used, we should
probably assume that the commons-math optimisations are appropriate.

In case it's not clear, I'm still in favour of copying over this small
amount of code from commons-math and maintaining it independently in
poi.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to