https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53101
--- Comment #7 from Yegor Kozlov <[email protected]> 2012-04-19 11:39:13 UTC --- I thought about removing all &'s too. The purpose of these operators is to guarantee that the the result fits in the .xls grid bounds (2^8 cols and 2^16 rows). We don't need them in general case, but I want research the problem and make sure it is really so. Yegor (In reply to comment #6) > How about removing the &'s altogether?: > > public ValueEval getRelativeValue(int relativeRowIndex, int > relativeColumnIndex) { > > int rowIx = relativeRowIndex + getFirstRow(); > int colIx = relativeColumnIndex + getFirstColumn(); > > return _evaluator.getEvalForCell(rowIx, colIx); > } > > This passes all the test as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
