Should be fixed again now.

Cheers... Dominik.


On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 12:10 PM, Dominik Stadler <[email protected]>wrote:

> Problem is here:
>
> -            colRef = colChar + colRef;
> +            colRef.append(colChar);
>
> the result in the new version is different as previously it was sort of a
> "prepend", not an append...
>
> Dominik.
>
>
> On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Dominik Stadler 
> <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> This is a classic use-case for "git bisect": Just kick it off and let it
>> work out which commit broke the test:
>>
>> Total time: 3 minutes 30 seconds
>> fd90a2319f81234730f311c4a3053b302343b54f is the first bad commit
>> commit fd90a2319f81234730f311c4a3053b302343b54f
>> Author: nick <nick@13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68>
>> Date:   Fri Aug 23 18:30:01 2013 +0000
>>
>>     Inspired by github pull-6, use a StringBuilder for quicker string
>> appending
>>
>>     git-svn-id: 
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/poi/trunk@151696913f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
>>
>> :040000 040000 0952c6318a7f2d8315e7e165b72b94cc8ca3f156
>> 09e64c6f5b1e5fbd017ea4e2937f89a1bc138398 M      src
>> bisect run success
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 8:45 PM, Nick Burch <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi All
>>>
>>> Is anyone else seeing a broken test on head?
>>>
>>>     [junit] Running org.apache.poi.hssf.**eventusermodel.**
>>> TestEventWorkbookBuilder
>>>     [junit] Tests run: 4, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.033 sec
>>>
>>> Testcase: testFormulas took 0.022 sec
>>>         FAILED
>>> expected:<SUM([Sh3]!A1:A4)> but was:<SUM(['Sh3']!A1:A4)>
>>> junit.framework.**ComparisonFailure: expected:<SUM([Sh3]!A1:A4)> but
>>> was:<SUM(['Sh3']!A1:A4)>
>>>         at org.apache.poi.hssf.**eventusermodel.**
>>> TestEventWorkbookBuilder.**testFormulas(**TestEventWorkbookBuilder.java:
>>> **138)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Nick
>>>
>>> ------------------------------**------------------------------**
>>> ---------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to