On Sun, 9 Nov 2014, Dominik Stadler wrote:
I am +1 for removing them and providing separate -javadocs.jar packages like it is done for most Maven based products, then everybody can choose to download them if necessary but does not need to if not needed. E.g. I am always using the source packages to not only have javadoc, but also the source code of open-source libraries.

Sounds like we have a conclusion then:
 * -bin package with all poi jars, their dependencies, and javadocs, for
   offline and non-maven users
 * -src package with sources + tests but no jars (downloaded on demand),
   for anyone wanting to rebuild, going forward no javadocs included
   (built on demand)
 * binary jars in maven central, for maven / ivy users
 * source jars in maven central, to aid debugging
 * new javadocs jars to go to maven central, to aid use

Does that seem a sensible plan to everyone, and does that cover what our users are likely to want / expect?

If so, we need a small change to the build script to exclude the full javadocs from the source package, and a slightly larger one to additionally build the javadocs on a per-module basis + package that as a javadocs jar suitable for maven central upload.

Nick

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to