Hi,
Dominik Stadler wrote > Andi will likely hate me for this, ... Surely not hate ... it's more like fear (like in school: "which failures have a made this time in the test?") I thought I do as Nick said - release from a fresh svn copy - and this worked without problems, so the ant build from svn works. With my slow DSL, I've started to wonder anyway if we really need (to upload/provide) those src archives. If someone wants to get involved, they should fetch the trunk from the svn. I haven't checked the latest commits, if you guys think they are safe, I have no problems repacking the files and providing a new RC and also checking (/patching if still necessary) the src archive. My problem is, that I have (quite probably) a competition next week starting on Wednesday (so no Tuesday night hacking) and the vote period is getting short. Dominik Stadler wrote > I am fine with noting this as "known issue" as probably not many > people will try to recompile the sources themselves, what do you > think? As pointed out above, I think most developers will use the SVN version. I don't mind repacking again, but I'm also ok with leaving it as-is. Andi -- View this message in context: http://apache-poi.1045710.n5.nabble.com/VOTE-Apache-POI-3-12-final-release-tp5718728p5718755.html Sent from the POI - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
