Nick Burch-2 wrote > It certainly used to be the case that some users didn't want the X##F > family of documents, and didn't want larger extra dependencies that they > needed, so they liked us keeping the split. With the "special" way that > Android does things like javax.xml, I believe that this could still be the > case for at least some of our users
In the common_sl, I've started to use JAXB for parsing the predefined geometry files. I guess - in the not so far future - the replacement of xmlbeans by JAXB is another change, I'd like to introduce. And having a component splitting, this change could be limited to (H/)XSLF for a start. This would probably reduce the schema-files and the format specific classes would go into the component jar instead of the poi-ooxml - of course there will ooxml binding classes which would be necessary for all X##F components and the common poi-ooxml won't vanish. Andi -- View this message in context: http://apache-poi.1045710.n5.nabble.com/Re-svn-commit-r1682117-poi-site-src-documentation-content-xdocs-document-index-xml-tp5718914p5718928.html Sent from the POI - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
