Hi Nick / Dominik, please update the javadocs for 3.13 again. I've used the unofficial windows openjdk 1.7 and it shuffles the javadocs, too.
Thank you ... and have fun at the con. Andi. On 10.08.2015 10:39, Dominik Stadler wrote: > Ok, yes, with openjdk-7 I get very similar results to previous runs. > > Dominik. > > On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 8:40 AM, Nick Burch <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Mon, 10 Aug 2015, Dominik Stadler wrote: >>> Sorry for the delay, I tried it and it seems to be similar for me, it >>> seems the results hugely depend on the actual version of Java that is >>> used. Do we have a "defined" version that we use? >> >> I think some projects get round it by having one of the build machines >> always do it. Others don't publish javadocs except during a release. Most >> curse Sun/Oracle every time, for their failure to think about this sort of >> thing in the javadoc spec/testing... >> >> I'm using OpenJDK 1.7 on linux, seems fairly stable between machines. (While >> POI is happy on 1.6, Tika has moved to 1.7, so I've changed my default dev >> jvm. The javadoc tool on OpenJDK 1.7 seems quite a bit faster than OpenJDK >> 1.6, which helps!) >> >> Nick >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
