On 10/23/2015 12:03 PM, David North wrote: > On 16/10/15 21:52, Andreas Beeker wrote: >> Hi, >> >>> Nick proposed we should have an ooxml-schemas-1.2 JAR containing visio, >>> security & main, rather than three separate artefacts. But keep the >>> existing lightweight one too. All agreed this made sense. ACTION: >>> Someone to implement this. >> As this seems to be shortly before done - and the security schema is kind of >> my "fault". >> Do we really need to increase the size of the full schema? >> >> Or to formulate it even more cynical, if users don't read the faq or >> component docs - >> they won't find the missing classes neither in the full schemas nor in the >> tripple. >> >> I personally prefer to have more smaller jars instead of a big one. >> Ideally every format has its own xml-jar. >> And to look a bit more into the future, I think the jaxb variant might be >> also smaller than xmlbeans - >> so speculating, small enough to include everything for the corresponding >> format. >> >> How about adding a profile (with description) to the maven poms - so a user >> can >> switch between the lite/full/triple dependency version? > Dustin, any thoughts? I have some work time allocated to POI next week > and am keen to do what I can to progress us towards 3.14 beta1 > > Thanks, > David > Hey David,
I'm not much of an expert on the schema stuff, so I don't have much to add here. I got the visio stuff added and incremented the version to 1.2 (and it's in trunk now), but once I started looking at combining the security jars it looks like it has special settings and such... so I'd rather someone else who knows how to test it to deal with it rather than myself. If that person is you, by all means go for it. :) I've pushed all of the XDGF changes that I have for now. I'm hoping to get some more test coverage added at some point. Dustin --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org
