https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60316
--- Comment #1 from Tim Allison <[email protected]> --- On further review, and given TIKA-2163, it looks like this is a whole new kettle of worms. The proposed fix is incorrect duct tape over a far larger issue. We aren't currently handling the glossaryDocument as a special relationship type. Anyone have experience with glossaryDocument? Looks like an entire other document stored within the document... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
