https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60795
--- Comment #4 from Tim Allison <talli...@mitre.org> --- Javen, I'm sorry for my delay. > Will we be able to remove/replace String getMessageClass() with > getMessageClassEnum()? Yes, and then back again much later, right? The user can still get the underlying StringChunk if they want the literal chunk. > The enum version calls the string version (for now). This would mean we'd > have to move some code around or rename public String getMessageClass () to > private String getMessageClassString(). I fixed that. Thank you. > mainChunks.getMessageClass() looks like this method is part of an interface. > Have we deprecated that method in the interface and all implementing classes? I don't think we should. That is a low-level call that returns the StringChunk. Advanced users should have access to that. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org
