On 6/11/18 11:14 AM, pj.fanning wrote: > I guess this means we'll need to call the next release 3.0.0.
I think so too ... > I'm not convinced that we need to build against newer JDKs than 1.6. Running > applications with a more up to data Java runtime is recommended but I'm not > sure we need to make Java 1.8 the minimum supported version. Although I'm also not sure which one to pick, I tend to 1.8 because of the security fixes in 1.7 and 1.7 is already at EOL [1] since April 2015. I assume the switch to the JAXP parser is compatible to Java 1.6/1.8 in the TypeLoader therefore we might push out two versions (in a not so long interval) - (the last) one for backwards compatibility/older libs and one to mark further development with Java 1.8+ Andi. [1] https://www.java.com/en/download/faq/java_7.xml
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
