3->4 is already a big upgrade, with lots of other API changes (all the Enums, for example). I think the direct use of NPOIFS will be small, and one more easy renaming migration step isn't that bad. I'd rather not keep even deprecated classes around longer than necessary.
On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 2:58 AM pj.fanning <fannin...@yahoo.com> wrote: > I'd prefer if we rename the NPOIFS classes to POIFS but also keep > deprecated > NPOIFS subclasses to reduce the impact on users who will be upgrading from > POI 3 to 4. > > > > -- > Sent from: http://apache-poi.1045710.n5.nabble.com/POI-Dev-f2312866.html > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org > >
