On 2017/11/03 23:32:18, [email protected] wrote:
> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61722
>
> --- Comment #1 from Greg Woolsey <[email protected]> ---
> This article[1] has an interesting set of tests, results, and summary info for
> multiple primitive collections frameworks, including Trove.
>
> Most interesting points to me:
> * Trove isn't under active development, and hasn't been for a few years. It
> was also slowest.
> * Fastutil is the overall winner for performance, although memory wasn't a
> consideration in these tests.
> * Fastutil is a 28M JAR file (!)
>
> If we are only interested in Map<int, ? extends Object> type maps, perhaps a
> slimmed-down version of a stable build of Fastutil could be used. It appears
> license compatible, and we could investigate an AutoJar or similar step added
> to the build to create an artifact bundled/released with POI.
>
> [1]
> http://java-performance.info/hashmap-overview-jdk-fastutil-goldman-sachs-hppc-koloboke-trove-january-2015/
>
> --
> You are receiving this mail because:
> You are the assignee for the bug.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>
+1 for fastutils. Have used it and liked it. Fast and reduces memory footprint.
Reliable for what I see, and the project is alive.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
