https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63046
--- Comment #1 from Axel Howind <[email protected]> --- Why not use log4j2 instead which now offers the same functionality that SLF4J does (seperation of API and backend), seems to perform better and has more functionality? What's more, it's an Apache project. There's an interesting discussion on stackoverflow in the comments to [this](https://stackoverflow.com/questions/41498021/is-it-worth-to-use-slf4j-with-log4j2) question, where one of the log4j2 devs and Ceki (the one behind SLF4J) are involved. Oh, and of course the answer by itself is also worth a read. After trying both, I would say: if your project already uses SLF4J, stick with it. If not, use Log4j2. What's more: SLF4J on Android is dead for more than 4 years now. I don't know how easy it is running POI on Android (I just googled and found at least two projects that do it), but it would be definitely easier if the used logging framework supports the platform. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
