I am also for option c) with a note in the release notes.

D.

On Mon, 31 Aug 2020, 10:48 Yegor Kozlov, <[email protected]> wrote:

> I would go for (c) and reflect it in the release notes.
> We can always revisit this code and  support commercial providers later .
>
> Yegor
>
>
> пн, 31 авг. 2020 г., 0:01 Andreas Beeker <[email protected]>:
>
> > Hello devs,
> >
> > XmlBeans reflects into the following classes (and Saxon helpers) when
> > searching for a Xquery implementation:
> >
> > - org.apache.xmlbeans.impl.store.OXQXBXqrlImpl
> > - org.apache.xmlbeans.impl.store.XqrlImpl
> > - org.apache.xmlbeans.impl.store.Xqrl2002Impl
> >
> > I still have to find those classes / sources, but they seem to be
> included
> > in 3rd party libs. [1] [2]
> >
> > In the advent of using JPMS, those classes should be packaged in the
> > xmlbeans module.
> >
> > How should we react?
> >
> > a) keep the old implementation as-is without testing it's functionality -
> > it for sure doesn't work with JPMS
> > b) try to reach out to the commercial providers and update the adapters
> > c) remove the obsolete calls and only use Saxon
> >
> > Andi
> >
> >
> > [1]
> >
> https://software.databasedevelop.com/article/14040274/Unable+to+get+Metadata+Manager+for+DVM+%22TicketingServices+resources+XQ+Ticketing_AttributeValuesDVM%22
> >
> > [2]
> >
> http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/database/database-technologies/bdc/big-data-connectors/downloads/index.html
> > (Oracle XQuery for Hadoop)
> >
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to