Yes, I do not think this should hold up a release. It has no ABI implications 
and only has API implications for users of languages or tools that 
analyze/enforce nullness, and those users are typically prepared for such 
breakage when they opt-in to the checking. So I think the ramifications of such 
a change in a future minor release are likely to be acceptable.

On 2020/12/02 23:21:43, "fannin...@apache.org" <fannin...@apache.org> wrote: 
> Thanks Marius for bringing up this topic.
> 
> POI is quite an old code base and I think it is safe to assume that virtually 
> any return type can be null and that inputs can often be null too.
> 
> If we start annotating the code, we would probably need to cover as many 
> methods as possible because it would be confusing to have the annotations in 
> some places but not in others.
> 
> There is a discussion about doing a 5.0.0 release because it is a while since 
> we did any releases. I'd prefer not to delay a release for this. We could 
> certainly consider it after the next release.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Wednesday 2 December 2020, 22:37:46 GMT, Marius Volkhart 
> <mar...@volkhart.com> wrote: 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Hello,
> 
> As I've been working more with POI, I frequently find myself looking at the
> javadoc and source for whether or not a function can return null. I wanted
> to ask, would a contribution adding nullability annotations be welcomed?
> 
> The basic idea is to annotate return values and method parameters with
> something like @Nullable and @NonNull. IDEs, static analysis tools, etc can
> then recognize these annotations and provide hints or analysis to the
> developer. For users of languages like Kotlin, that have stronger concepts
> of nullability, this is particularly helpful.
> 
> The first consideration would be which annotations to use. A lot has been
> written on this. The JSR-305 FindBugs annotations come with licensing and
> legal concerns <https://github.com/google/guava/issues/2960> for example.
> However, projects like Spring Framework
> <https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework/issues/20099> have
> found ways around this. If indeed this contribution is of interest, I can
> go into more details on annotation selection and all that.
> 
> The next consideration is how to do this without 1. making the POI codebase
> a mess, and 2. without making the task so monumental that one cannot
> complete it. Again, if the contribution is of interest, I can go into more
> details of a plan for anyone interested.
> 
> --
> Cheers,
> Marius Volkhart
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org
> 
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org

Reply via email to