https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64979
--- Comment #3 from Andreas Beeker <[email protected]> --- (In reply to PJ Fanning from comment #2) > Possibly, a bit late but I wonder if we should put the word transitional in > the jar name(s) because we are working with the transitional xsd instead of > the strict xsd. Even if there's an issue #57699, I think this transition "never" ends and we won't support the strict schema in the near future and transitional sounds like temporary to me - "here we have some fresh schemas for you, but take them as they are hot" ;) I thought keeping the artifacts names short is also beneficial. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
